I have not watched the video but it doesnât matter, by your answers I can already understand what happened.
I donât think, based on what Mark also said recently, that this is an easy issue to tackle.
There are 2 main problems, probably:
- Understanding the concept behind LingQ
- Understanding the software and platform
Understanding the concept
I donât know if this has been well explained in the tutorial material but it is true that some guidance is necessary.
The fact is that, for example, I have changed quite a while the way I use LingQ in these years and I donât think it is so easy to guide a user to do things in one way when there are actually a lot more ways to achieve the same results.
Probably the risk is that in one direction LingQ would risk to oversimplify and in the other to overcomplicate.
I have learnt by trial and error and by discussing a lot with fellow forum members like you. Sometimes by conflicting idea I have learnt to change my own ideas and methods. It is not so easy to write a roadmap because there are many.
Understanding the software and platform
Again, this is another thing not so easy to tackle because the platform is constantly changing. It is not easy to dedicate lots of time writing tutorials when something often change. Imaging only what happened in the last few months. With the introduction of TTS and Whisper my personal âworkflowâ completed changed. I didnât change the core concept by I definitely changed a lot the way I use LingQ and also the material Iâve been using.
Who knows what will happen in six months.
The problem I see is that core learners, that embrace LingQâs philosophy and are able to create their own study plan, understand how to fit LingQ to their purpose and are able to adapt to any problem, finding various workarounds to maintain their studies.
Beginners or even other learners that are not so core learners, or I donât know how to better define them, have a hard time to understand what to do and how to do it.
It is true that you say 20 LingQs are not enough for a beginner but the reality is that you need months to understand how to better create your own study plan and understand the platform. It is better to say to a user to invest at least 1 year and donât give up so easily, and learn step by step the software and the method before taking any other decision.
Of course, there are tons of improvements that can be done, and I definitely share many of your thoughts on this as we live them every day, but I just want to say that it seems to me that it is not a so easy task to pinpoint what exactly to say to a beginner to understand this big package of âLingQ software/concept of vocabulary/importing material/library/etc.â.
Imho.