lol
Yea, and the successful state of ISIS that is Saudia Arabia. Itâs ISIS that made it. - YouTube
I donât know which country would be more miserable to live in.
Reuters is a good one. They are known for their objectivity.
WSJ is the most reliable newspaper that I have read so far
Fox news is pure propaganda. Studies say that people who watch fox news are less informed than people who watch no news at all.
MSNBC is basically team democrat so they are lousy as well. I wouldnât bother watching either.
I always shake my head when lefties accuse the media of right wing bias.
Sure, it happens. Pat yourself on the back - you guys have it all figured out.
But look at the studies â msm is left wing biased.
Journalism majors, more often than not, register as Democrat, and the college system pushes them further.
What do you think you will get from this?
Also, see this great piece before and after the election. Sums up why the left canât even buy a major election these days (and it is not from lack of trying to buy elections either).
Before election vs after election:
https://pics.onsizzle.com/slate-slate-slate-slate-five-very-good-reasons-to-keep-6883186.png
My favorites are The Huffington Post, the Young Turks, Breitbart and InfoWars!
Info wars is the funniest show. I particularly liked the episode where AJ said that Hillary Clinton was a literal demon who was possessed and wanted to destroy the planet.
The scary thing is that sometimes AJ is right and itâs frightening because then you think about all of his other crazy claims and you wonder if some of them are also correct.
@Jalicostate
Info Wars & Alex JonesâŚhmmâŚ
So letâs say itâs late at night - real late. Maybe there are a few shots of something-or-other sloshing around in the equation too. Maybe a combination of alcohol and fatigue has induced a certain hazy film over our normal thought processes? At such a time as this, the dark ghost of a thought may indeed flit as a shadow across some recess of the mind: maybe that bat__t crazy stuff that Alex Jones says isâŚTRUE? :-0
Of course, a few hours later, come the light of a new day, come the Queen-mother of all hangovers, it all seems perfectly laughable. How could anyone be such a fool as to entertain these ideas - even for a second?
But, just for an ephemeral stretch of time, we did touch the Jonesean matrix of thought. Our eyes did bulge with a mixture of bovine terror and Texan rage. And we did know that the only solution to our problems would be to swear fanatical and unquestioning loyalty to Donald Trump!
@Prinz_Brexiteer
I should be grateful, if you would tell me what the writer of the article on the Daily Mail news site saw with his own eyes in Iraq.
Before you order someone else to âcleanseâ the âpsychotic pseudo-theocratic monstersâ, could you sum up for us what the writer of the news article saw in Iraq?
InfoWars can be entertaining sometimes. Especially when their reporters go out meeting protestors
Fox news is not any worse than BBC, MSNBC, CNN, daily mail and the like. Read any of these with extra caution
You choose not to believe the story - noted.
For my part, it wouldnât change anything if this story were untrue (which I very much doubt - given what we do know about these thugs and their track record.)
I have seen enough from ISISâs own videos (live burnings, crucifixions, beheadings, drownings, etc) to know what I think about them.
KILL THEM
ââŚBefore you order someone else to âcleanseââŚâ
I guess you do have a point here - before âorderingâ this mighty legion of fighting men that I have at my personal behest, I should check the Daily Mailâs source for one story. Of course.
Why would you subject yourself to seeing such videos? Is it just another one of those âI just canât resistâ things or what?
The following site is interesting.
Pro-Trump, pro-Le Pen, and anti-EU.
Sums them up pretty decently
That is a good question - one which deserves a clear answer.
I think we need to understand what we are dealing with here. Unfortunately that means there can be no room for squeamish flinching. Itâs kind of the same the same as an oncologist studying the progression of cancer - the subject matter might be desperately ugly and depressing. But one canât deal with it or fight against it with only half a view.
ISIS are a greater menace than many in the West grasp, in my opinion. It is an aggressive and expansionist ideology. I do not believe they will be content with terrorising people in predominantly Islamic countries with their death-cult - but rather that they seek insidiously to infiltrate the West as well. Itâs all too easy to be complacent, and say âthis stuff could never happen in Europe or North Americaâ, etc. Why couldnât it? There is no guarantee about this if we (including decent people in the Islamic world) arenât prepared to fight ruthlessly against them, to kill them and destroy them and their supporters/sympathisers wherever we can.
BTW I worry that there are all too many do-gooders out there who would lack the stomach for a really ugly fight - if they actually had to defend their cosy liberal values against these thugs.
The problem is unless the problem of instability and sectarian divide in Iraq is somehow solved, wiping out ISIS wonât do much. The next group will come in and be even worse. Terrorism is a systemic problem in the region that thrives on chaos.