Please consider the Gemini 2.0 Flash model.
Its pricing is 2/3 of the GPT-4o-mini model, and its performance is much better than GPT’s one. I’ve been using this for a few months, and the performance gap is clear (including multilingual reasoning). The reason for this conclusion is as follows: I’ve tried the same job with GPT for a long time with prompting, but it always fails, but with Gemini, it works perfectly with relatively short and compact prompting.
LingQ’s default lesson pre-processor almost always omit or transform some part of the transcript, and sometimes it doesn’t work totally so the lesson becomes a pile of short, incomplete sentences.
This is an evidence:
However, when I use Gemini 2.0 Flash with my custom prompt, it works perfectly. You might get the same result with the error cases that users reported. Please consider using Gemini at least for English. It will improve the learning experience so much.
This is the script
Why "LingQ import" modify my content? - #3 by vet8t6z79pc4
p.s.
I’m a native Korean, and in a Korean LLM community, it is said that Gemini’s performance is better than GPT’s one when chatting in Korean, and I also agree with that.
It would be nice if you could give us a roadmap for 2025.